The Crimson Horror. It had to be a period piece really
didn’t it?
Despite having written the third largest number of
stories since Doctor Who’s revival, behind Steven Moffat and Russell T Davies
(obvs) Mark Gatiss is not the show’s most reliable writer. Both The Unquiet
Dead and The Idiots’ Lantern are amongst the dreariest offerings of their
respective seasons. Utterly unambitious and happy to be mostly forgettable
tales.
Victory of the Daleks feels like it should be a lot more
special than it actually is (and is remembered mainly for the poorly judged
Dalek redesigns). Night Terrors… well, isn’t too bad by the standards of the
Moffat Era, but that’s not saying a great deal. It gets a little boring after
Gatiss has run through all the clever tricks he can think of though. Which
doesn’t take long.
Cold War I’ve discussed here. Suffice to say I didn’t think it was particularly riveting.
In short, he’s not built up a glowing track record for
himself. He’s become known as a writer who gets brought in to deliver a script
on time and to budget. He also has a habit of producing scripts that feel like
they’d fit snugly into the Jon Pertwee era with just a few minor tweaks.
There’s nothing wrong with Pertwee’s Doctor or the bulk of his stories but it’s
not what writers should be striving for in 2005 and beyond, is it?
What I’m building to here is that despite his reputation
as being little more than a safe pair of hands with a fixation on the first
half of the 1970s and a distinct lack of scintillating Who credits to his name
Gatiss managed to turn out one of the best episodes of the current series. The
Crimson Horror was watchable. That’s not something that can be said about much
of series seven.
Things were kept moving, there was a villain to be
opposed and a mystery to be solved. These things are all too often missing from
the show these days, leaving the regulars and whatever major guests are
appearing to drift from one scene to the next gabbling quips at one another in
a desperate attempt to fool people into thinking something, anything, is happening.
This is not to say it was perfect. The sentimentality of
the mother and daughter relationship was laid on very thick. As was Diana
Riggs’ accent. If she was going for comedy Northerner she nailed it. If she was
going for anything else (and she should have been) she was way off the mark. Madam
Vastra and her comedy menagerie were back. They’ve not been involved in
anything worthwhile yet and I don’t expect that to ever change.
The name of Mr Sweet was pretty ridiculous too. That’s a
minor quibble I know, but when you’ve got to hear a name said so many times
throughout an episode it shouldn’t make you think of a paedophilic clown. Not
that there are any paedophilic clowns called Mr Sweet (that I know of), but
it’s the image that the name conjured up. Perhaps that says more about me.
The real gem was Matt Smith’s Red Skin Acting. It was his
ropiest performance since taking the part. How nobody in a position of
authority saw the rushes and demanded retakes that were more convincing is
beyond me. It was an offensively hammy performance.
But, y’know, I still don’t think it was a totally bad
episode. Which says more about the quality of the current run than the quality
of this particular episode. I feel like I’ve said that before.
No comments:
Post a Comment