Remember how Steven Moffat built up the mid-season finale
of Doctor Who’s sixth series in 2011 (A Good Man Goes to War)? He claimed it
would be “game changing”, altering not just the course of the show but the way
we viewed its past. It was a pretty big shout, even on his budget.
It turned out that his idea of the game being changed was
revealing the identity and hinting at some of the backstory of a character he’d
introduced three years earlier and who few non-fans (and fans for that matter)
truly cared about. Suffice it to say that the game remained resolutely
unchanged.
The conclusion to that season was less hyped but
promotional interviews still featured Moffat talking up how exciting and
unpredictable it would be. It wasn’t. Similar talk for Asylum of the Daleks,
The Angels Take Manhattan, The Snowmen, and The Bells of St John all failed
spectacularly too. Moffat has displayed a spectacular knack for failing to
deliver on his promises in these situations.
He's been back at it for this Saturday’s episode. To a
certain extent you can't blame him. It is his job after all. But while he’s
contractually obligated to talk up any and every episode of Doctor Who as though
it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread, paying particular care to paint
season finales as unmissable televisual events, he's not contractually obligated to come up with ridiculous episode names
like The Name of the Doctor.
During his recent media ramblings Moffat has said several
things about this episode. He's told us that the Doctor's biggest secret will
be revealed, we'll find out the secret of Clara, new villains the Whispermen
will be one of his better monsters, and has once again trotted out his rubbish
about this episode changing the way we look at the show. That's quite a
JNT-style shopping list he's cobbled together for himself, isn't it? It’s tough
not to go into the finale expecting anything but an overly busy mess.
Is Moffles going to reveal the Doctor's name? I find it hard
to believe he will (although if any executive producer were ever going to do it
it would be him). This is a perfect example of him going for big ideas that
sound "epic" but actually aren't. It’s something designed to grab
headlines in a surprisingly quiet fiftieth anniversary year, not something that
hints at a gripping story. What would we gain from finding out the Doctor's
name? Nothing. How would it benefit or change the show for the better? It
wouldn't. There is no possible name that could do the mystery justice, and even
if there were there’s no payoff to finding out.
What I think Moffat will reveal instead is the mystery
behind the name, a move that would fail to have the impact of revealing the
actual name while at the same time appearing to have meaning. In other words
something so daft and pointless it’s right up The Moff’s alley.
We’ll find out that the Doctor gave up his name when he
left Gallifrey centuries ago or that he’s had to hide it because it’s so
powerful that if spoken by the wrong person it could be used as a weapon. If
it’s the former we could see Moffat lift the fan theory that all Time Lords
that leave their home planet have to give up their name and have to choose a
title instead, for whatever reason. If it’s the latter we could find the
Doctor’s hidden his name in a book and stashed it in the TARDIS’s library.
I’m not saying either idea is brilliant, should air, or
is what I personally want to see, but they’re the sorts of concept that appear
impressive at first glance. Of course on a second or third glance they begin to
look pretty ropey, but by that point Moffat’s gotten away with it and he’s off
tinkering on his next mediocre idea.
The topic of the name is going to be addressed. Even
Moffat wouldn’t be so brazen as to go with that title only to do nothing. Something will happen, even if
it’s disappointing or stupid or both.
I suspect it will tie into the First Question thread he
introduced at the end of season six. By providing an answer, any answer to the “Doctor
who?” question that has been cropping up in the programme since the days of
William Hartnell Moffat will be creating something that retroactively affects
every episode that’s ever gone before. Once he’s aired his punchline the next
time you watch a Jon Pertwee story and the joke gets used you’ll think of The
Name of the Doctor.
I’m convinced that’s something Moffat would love. It’s a
lazy approach but so what? It’s not like there’s no precedent for Moffatian
laziness.
All of that said his job isn’t just to write something
good, it’s to get the highest rating possible. It’s likely that the title The
Name of the Doctor will get one of the best ratings of the season. While that
doesn’t whollyexcuse the move it does make it a little more understandable and
bearable. It’ll still come back to bite him though. When viewers realise Moff’s
not delivered on his promise they’ll be less inclined to watch the next
similarly-titled canon-fest.
The secret of Clara is doomed to be an uninspiring piece
of technobabble that has no bearing on how we see her. Moffat's had to resort
to scripting a special teaser trailer in which the Doctor and Clara explain to
the camera how they both feel about each other because he's not bothered to
write anything addressing said feelings into the previous seven episodes. It’s not only typical of him but also shows that
there's nothing to go back and re-evaluate.
It’s possible the Whispermen will be better than the
Silence or the Weeping Angels but it’s not likely. Both of those races are very
good central ideas that are aided by great designs. The Whispermen don’t look
bad but there’s something a bit Sarah Jane Adventures about them. I have no
idea what Moffat could have cooked up to better instantly forgettable invaders
or statues that move when you’re not looking.
As for the vain hope of a surprise regeneration? We should
be so lucky. Moffat wouldn’t be satisfied with anything so simple.
Very true.
ReplyDelete