I’m looking forward to The Day of the Doctor, but I’m not one of the seemingly many people with reams of questions about what will happen. Years of Moffat’s producership have taught me not to get my hopes up. He is, after all, the man who claimed that he’d got a “game-changing” revelation lined up only to reveal that it was just the fairly obvious true identity of a character he’d introduced a few years earlier.
No, I don’t expect much from Moffat. He’s proven that he’s
relatively capable of scripting a frothy runaround and so that’s what I’m
hoping for here. It seems like the least of a host of potential evils.
What’s all this about people escaping from paintings? Will
Chris Eccleston appear? Will Hurt’s Doctor regenerate? Are there more “secret”
Doctors? Is the possession of The Moment as meaningful as we’ve been led to
believe? What’s the regeneration Moffat claims we’ve overlooked? These are some
of the questions a lot of fans (many, it must be said, from the excitable
realms of North America) are working themselves into a frenzy predicting answers
to. Some interest me more than others but none have provoked me into sitting
and thinking for hours on end about how it all links together. It’s impossible
to get every aspect right so why try? Just sit back and think about the
practical things that you can predict.
For example…
A friend pointed out to me many months ago that having
Zygons in the episode is the perfect chance for Moffat to pull one of his
favourite tricks: a twist that at first seems wonderful but on second look is
straightforward and, ultimately, crushingly boring. How hard is it to imagine a
Zygon posing as the a former Doctor? Not very. Perhaps Hurt’s Doctor is a Zygon
imposter. “But we saw him in the Doctor’s timestream!” you cry. Yeah, but we
also saw the Great Intelligence and Clara there. It was a pretty packed place.
A Zygon sneaking in or, more likely, bonding itself into the Doctor’s memories
(or whatever) seems as plausible as anything else.
This is one of the many scenarios I hope we don’t see.
Even talk of practicalities becomes an exercise in futility.
Eccleston then. I’d like to see him appear but I’m not
banking on it. He seems as keen as ever to distance himself from the show. A
regeneration for Hurt leading to a brief cameo seems the likeliest way he’d
crop up, which would ironically lead to him looking older than he ever did in
his solitary year at the moment of his “birth”. I wouldn’t care one way or the
other if that happened. I don’t think I’ll ever shake the feeling that Hurt is
only appearing because Eccleston said no to the concept of being the dark
Doctor of the Time War. From what’s been revealed of the plot it seems that
Hurt is nothing more than a surrogate for the Ninth Doctor we met in 2005. It’s
a way of sticking to the story he wanted without the “right” actor.
A Hurt to Eccleston regeneration would ultimately be
meaningless anyway, another piece of contrived lore crammed in by an
overzealous Moffat. But that approach has characterised his entire approach to
the fiftieth. Hollow promises about the last half a century merely having been “the
first chapter” and a tedious focus on something that was created to
emphatically remain off-screen have been the order of the day, instead of the
talk of a fun episode with an enjoyable story and a returning Doctor that I
would have liked to hear.
And while we're on the subject of the show's lore, the twelve regenerations "rule" that's being quoted in papers and magazines and by fans... well, it's silly isn't it? It was a throwaway element of a story in the mid-seventies and has stuck mainly because it's a number that feels right. The number of people that think it's a significant problem that must be solved is staggering. Doctor is a science fantasy show for kids. It will not end because Robert Holmes arbitrarily selected the number thirteen as the times a single Time Lord could live. Within the logic of the show it's easy enough to resolve. The Master's been offered new regeneration cycles before. He's even been resurrected, presumably after his "final" death. Is it really that hard to imagine the Thirteenth Doctor (whether that's Capaldi or someone else) getting an episode in which they stumble across some ancient relic of Time Lord tech that grants a new cycle or even an infinite supply? No, it's not. Because the continuation of the show is more important to the BBC than adhering to nonsense laws introduced for dramatic effect.
And while we're on the subject of the show's lore, the twelve regenerations "rule" that's being quoted in papers and magazines and by fans... well, it's silly isn't it? It was a throwaway element of a story in the mid-seventies and has stuck mainly because it's a number that feels right. The number of people that think it's a significant problem that must be solved is staggering. Doctor is a science fantasy show for kids. It will not end because Robert Holmes arbitrarily selected the number thirteen as the times a single Time Lord could live. Within the logic of the show it's easy enough to resolve. The Master's been offered new regeneration cycles before. He's even been resurrected, presumably after his "final" death. Is it really that hard to imagine the Thirteenth Doctor (whether that's Capaldi or someone else) getting an episode in which they stumble across some ancient relic of Time Lord tech that grants a new cycle or even an infinite supply? No, it's not. Because the continuation of the show is more important to the BBC than adhering to nonsense laws introduced for dramatic effect.
Will November 23rd 2013 go down as the
beginning of chapter two? No. It will go as the day another of Moff’s hyperbolic
shams was revealed. This is not to say the episode’s going to be bad, more that
it won’t be the startling new direction Moffles is promising. I’m setting my
expectations low. And you should too.
As Peter Capaldi is reportedly playing the Doctor as angrier and Scottish, and with Armando Iannucci interested in writing an episode maybe this is the end of chapter one. Heres to 50 years of profane adult Who- Capaldi, Mayall, someone from Geordie Shore.. .
ReplyDeleteInteresting that even when being clearly facetious you can't bring yourself to suggest a woman or a black guy (or indeed a black woman). Clearly you are a true fan, winky smiley.
DeleteThere are women on Geordie shore, anyone who is a bit foul really
DeleteRussell Brand then. He always looks like he needs a good wash.
Delete